Skills this job asks for
LLMsLean / Six SigmaProduct management
Add your CV (free) to see which of these your CV is missing.
Sponsorship verdict
No sponsorship evidence yet
No government record and no wording either way. Not a refusal: ask the recruiter.
-
?
No government sponsor record hereThis employer posted directly and does not match a government sponsor register.
-
?
The posting doesn’t mention sponsorshipSilence isn’t a refusal — ask the recruiter before investing much time.
-
?
No salary bar for this routeH-1B has no fixed salary bar: the employer must pay at least the prevailing wage for the role and area.
-
✓
Confirmed live todayWhen a source last listed this job as open.
Details and sources
- No salary bar for this route
- H-1B has no fixed salary bar: the employer must pay at least the prevailing wage for the role and area. Cap-subject employers enter a lottery weighted by wage level. Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/12/29/2025-23853/weighted-selection-process-for-registrants-and-petitioners-seeking-to-file-cap-subject-h-1b, rules effective 2026-02-27.
US H-1B: cap-subject employers enter a lottery weighted by wage level — Level I gets 1 entry, Level IV gets 4 (DHS projected selection odds ≈15% at Level I to ≈61% at Level IV). Universities and non-profit research employers are cap-exempt. The $100,000 fee for new petitions from abroad is currently blocked by a court order (appeal pending).
A verdict summarises public evidence. It is not legal advice and never a guarantee: the employer and the immigration authority decide. Sign in to factor in where you can already work.
Before you apply
Sponsorship unknown
No register record and no sponsorship wording in the posting. Worth asking the employer before investing significant time.
These come from the posting’s own wording. Read the original listing to confirm. See better-fit alternatives →
About the role
About Nous
Nous is a household AI agent. It takes over the bills and admin people don't have time for and acts for them: switching energy, buying insurance, cancelling forgotten subscriptions, managing the family calendar. Nearly 250,000 UK households have signed up, and another joins every minute.
We think the real value of AI isn't writing amazing cover letters, it's doing useful things in the real world for real people. That's the hard part, and a brilliant product is only half of it. An energy switch takes weeks, so our agents run on long-running workflows, not a single chat turn. Cancelling a subscription means a browser agent handling the code Apple sends to your phone. Buying insurance meant getting our regulatory principal comfortable with an agent doing it end to end (a UK first), which comes down to knowing exactly when the LLM should hand over to rules because a mistake would cost someone real money.
We're about 30 people running one agent across energy, broadband, mobile, insurance, mortgages and subscriptions (with more being added), each with its own suppliers, rules and ways of going wrong. With far more problems than people, a person or small team owns each one end to end, from spotting it in the data or a customer conversation to shipping the fix. And because the agent acts, you find out quickly whether the fix worked.
Everyone builds here: a product engineer launched our subscription cancellation product within a couple of months of joining, and a PM rebuilt our WhatsApp agent.
And it's working. We're growing more than 20x year on year, with a market-leading NPS above +80, and we manage well over half a billion pounds of household spending. We've raised more than $30M from Heartcore, Mosaic and a who's who of entrepreneurs who founded Monzo, GoCardless, lastminute.com and Onfido. But the real draw is the team - ask anyone here why they joined and you'll get some version of "to do great work with really smart people".
The goal is household life that's simpler, cheaper and fairer, and most of that is still to build.
How we build (worth reading before the role)
How products get built is changing fast. With AI tooling, a PM can prototype, dig into production data and commit production code to get a change live all in an afternoon. An engineer can own a product area end to end and decide what to build next.
We're leaning into that. Our PMs lean into code and our engineers run products: one of our engineers owns the car insurance targets. We care about whatever gets the job done most effectively, regardless of once upon a time whose job it was meant to be.
We're moving fast and adapting as we go, and we don't have all the answers yet. What should a squad look like when everyone can build? Where does process still help, and where does it just slow you down? What's a PM for when an engineer can run the experiment themselves? We're working it out, and we want someone who is excited to be part of helping figure it out.
About the role
So where does a PM fit? A lot of our work still suits squads: clear targets, a few service lines and a team of engineers. Those squads need product managers to run them. All our roles in product overlap, but this one is centred on product management. If you’d rather spend all your time building, have a look at our Product Builder role.
You’ll take a squad responsible for a key section of our product and service lines and grow them: expand what they cover, understand the levers that drive their performance (automation, new suppliers, what we recommend to members) and increase their commercial value.
Being a Product Manager at Nous is one of the hardest roles we have. The product is complex and we move fast, so you need to be able to hold a lot of context. You'll switch between very differen
View original listing ↗