Sponsorship verdict
No sponsorship evidence yet
No government record and no wording either way. Not a refusal: ask the recruiter.
-
?
No government sponsor record hereThis employer posted directly and does not match a government sponsor register.
-
?
The posting doesn’t mention sponsorshipSilence isn’t a refusal — ask the recruiter before investing much time.
-
?
Can’t check pay against the visa rulesWe don’t have visa salary rules for this country yet.
-
✓
Confirmed live todayWhen a source last listed this job as open.
Details and sources
A verdict summarises public evidence. It is not legal advice and never a guarantee: the employer and the immigration authority decide. Sign in to factor in where you can already work.
Before you apply
Sponsorship unknown
No register record and no sponsorship wording in the posting. Worth asking the employer before investing significant time.
These come from the posting’s own wording. Read the original listing to confirm. See better-fit alternatives →
About the role
About Alta Ares
Alta Ares is an air defense Neoprime. We build AI-guided interceptors to counter drones and cruise missiles, along with the software platform that powers them.
Our customers are NATO-aligned militaries and defense institutions, and our systems are regularly deployed during live exercises and operational demonstrations across Europe, the Middle East, and Asia.
Founded in 2024, we have grown to 90 people, raised over $60M, and increased revenue 40× this year. We are now entering a new phase of international expansion, industrial scaling, fundraising, and product development.
Context
We are looking for hybrid profile, sitting at the intersection of strategy and engineering, able to rigorously evaluate the technology choices made by the R&D and innovation teams, audit our internal capabilities, and challenge product/tech trade-offs with a business lens. This is not a technical team management role, but a role of constructive counter-power and strategic alignment between engineering and business priorities.
You will ensure that our technological decisions (R&D, innovation, architecture choices, build vs buy, roadmap prioritization) are aligned with overall strategy, economically sound, and robust by actively challenging the relevant teams rather than rubber-stamping their proposals.
Role & Missions:
Strategic and technical challenge
• Challenge the technical choices and roadmaps proposed by R&D and the Innovation team (architecture, stack, prioritization, build vs buy vs partner)
• Question the underlying assumptions behind technical projects (feasibility, ROI, strategic alignment, technical debt incurred)
• Produce well-argued, independent analyses not rubber-stamped validations
Technology and market watch
• Run continuous technical and technology watch (competitors, emerging technologies, market trends, new tools, and platforms) to keep the company's decisions informed by the state of the art
• Identify technologies or approaches that could create a competitive advantage, or expose the company to being left behind
• Turn watch findings into actionable inputs for the R&D/Innovation roadmap and for COMEX-level strategic discussions
• Build and maintain a structured watch process (sources, cadence, internal distribution) rather than ad hoc monitoring
Capability audit
• Regularly map and assess the company's technical capabilities (skills, tools, infrastructure, external dependencies)
• Identify areas of risk, over-investment, under-investment, or critical dependency
• Benchmark our capabilities against the market and competitors
Technology strategy
• Contribute to defining the company's technology strategy alongside the Strategy & Operations Director
• Assess build, buy, partner, or acquisition opportunities on technology topics
• Inform R&D resource allocation decisions with a strategic and financial lens
Reporting and governance
• Produce syntheses and recommendations for COMEX on tech-strategy topics
• Set up tracking indicators on technical execution vs. commitments made
• Participate in R&D/Innovation committees as an independent strategic voice
Candidate profile
Experience
• 5-6 years of overall experience, engineering background (degree in engineering or equivalent)
• Ideal trajectory: 2-3 years of hands-on technical execution, followed by 2-3 years in a hybrid technical/business role e.g. Engineer → Technical Product Manager, Engineer → tech-focused strategy consulting, or Engineer → Chief of Staff to a CTO/VP Engineering
• Profiles with only pure execution experience (no exposure to business trade-offs) or only early technical experience followed by years of generalist consulting (no longer technically credible) are not a fit for this role
• Given the seniority level, the candidate
View original listing ↗