Jobs / United States / Intersystems Corporation
Senior Technical Program Manager
Intersystems Corporation · 🇺🇸 Boston, MA
Sponsorship verdict
Sponsorship possible
One solid signal, not two — worth applying, and worth asking about sponsorship early.
- Employer is on a government sponsor recordThe US Department of Labor certified 53 H-1B/E-3 labor condition applications for this employer between Oct 2025 and Jun 2026 (latest Jun 2026) — the step every H-1B hire needs first. USCIS also records 6 H-1B approvals in FY2023. Source: LCA disclosure data (US Department of Labor (OFLC)).
- The posting doesn’t mention sponsorshipSilence isn’t a refusal — ask the recruiter before investing much time.
- No salary bar for this routeH-1B has no fixed salary bar: the employer must pay at least the prevailing wage for the role and area. Cap-subject employers enter a lottery weighted by wage level. Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/12/29/2025-23853/weighted-selection-process-for-registrants-and-petitioners-seeking-to-file-cap-subject-h-1b, rules effective 2026-02-27.
- What Intersystems Corporation paid sponsored hires in similar roles20 certified filings for “Core Development Program” (Software Developers) in MA: $111k–$138k, median $124k. Most were filed at wage level I (70%) — 1 lottery entry, ≈15% projected selection odds for cap-subject employers. Source: US Department of Labor LCA disclosure data (Oct 2025 – Jun 2026).
- Confirmed live todayWhen a source last listed this job as open.
US H-1B: cap-subject employers enter a lottery weighted by wage level — Level I gets 1 entry, Level IV gets 4 (DHS projected selection odds ≈15% at Level I to ≈61% at Level IV). Universities and non-profit research employers are cap-exempt. The $100,000 fee for new petitions from abroad is currently blocked by a court order (appeal pending).
A verdict summarises public evidence; it is not legal advice and never a guarantee — the employer and the immigration authority decide. Sign in to factor in where you can already work.
Or apply yourself on the official page →
Sponsor Radar — Intersystems Corporation
The US Department of Labor certified 53 H-1B/E-3 labor condition applications for this employer between Oct 2025 and Jun 2026 (latest Jun 2026) — the step every H-1B hire needs first. USCIS also records 6 H-1B approvals in FY2023. Source: LCA disclosure data (US Department of Labor (OFLC)).
Past sponsorship or register membership never guarantees sponsorship for this vacancy or for you. Full Sponsor Radar for Intersystems Corporation →
About the role
We are seeking an experienced Technical Program Manager to support the growth of the world's most innovative HealthCare data platform. InterSystems HealthShare is the engine behind some of the world's most critical health applications. We are the platform technology that empowers mission-critical solutions across health plans, providers, and public sector. About the Role This is a founding Technical Program Manager role for HealthShare. You will report to the Head of Product and stand up the TPM function for the platform, defining how it works from the ground up. You will own the connective tissue between Product, Engineering, Quality Development, and the Release Team: the dependencies between them, the handoffs where one team's work becomes another's, and the readiness of the releases that span all four. This is a role for someone who has built this foundational function before and understands the distinction that makes it work. Engineering owns delivery on its teams. Quality owns quality. The Release Team owns the release. The TPM owns the seams between them, the cross-team dependency graph, and the standard for how work is tracked and made visible, without taking on the work that belongs to those teams or drifting into collecting status on their behalf. If you are energized by defining an operating model rather than inheriting one, and by making a fast-moving, technically deep organization legible to itself without slowing it down, this role is built for you. What You'll Own • The seams between Product, Engineering, Quality Development, and the Release Team. Name the handoffs, assign an owner on each side, define what passes across each boundary, and set the escalation path for when something breaks, before the release that tests it. • The cross-team dependency graph. Maintain an explicit, current picture of what depends on what across teams, so the organization can make deliberate decisions about sequencing and risk instead of discovering a major dependency the week it blocks a release. • Launch and release readiness for cross-functional work that spans multiple teams. Know, before a date is committed, whether the engineering work, the quality gates, the release steps, and the downstream communication are going to converge. • The tracking standard in Jira and Confluence. Define how work is structured and made visible, so program state is readable directly, without a status meeting. Make the compliant path the easy path so teams follow it because it helps them, not because they are told to. • Risk identification and communication across the platform. Surface the cross-team risks the individual teams are too close to see and get them in front of the right people early, using Teams and the tools the organization already operates. • Program-level visibility for leadership. Give the Head of Product and senior stakeholders a legible read on program health that is a byproduct of how teams already work, not a separate reporting tax layered on top of them. What We're Looking For • 10+ years in technical program management or a closely related discipline, including experience standing up or scaling a program-management function, not only running programs within an existing one. • Strong technical fluency. You do not need to write production code, but you should read a system well enough to find the real risk in a plan and hold your own with senior engineers on dependencies and architecture. • Experience delivering managed services and cloud services, and comfort with the operational realities of both. • A clear, demonstrated point of view on the difference between technical program management and a PMO, and on why performing hygiene work on behalf of teams is a failure mode rather than a service. • A track record of bui